On Wed, 27 Nov 2019 15:48:13 +0100, Stephane wrote in message 
<22221179-8fb9-d4ad-4d34-70ad26abf...@univ-paris1.fr>:

> > .nope, dunno those .eml files, only tried this with digests, and you
> > wanna do one at the time even in scripts to avoid messing up your
> > email archive with malformed messages lurking in your digests.  
> 
> DIGEST="Dng Digest, Vol 62, Issue 31.eml" ; cat "$DIGEST" |formail -ds
> or
> DIGEST="Dng Digest, Vol 62, Issue 31.eml" ; cat "$DIGEST" |formail +1
> -ds
> 
> don't work.

..formail needs a proper procmail setup to work properly. 

> 
> > ..and still quite often the appropriate way to deal with it. ;o)  
> 
> This is a part of free computing spirit nowadays that annoys me.
> 
> > ..you manage your own box?  Install procmail there,  
> 
> What do you call "box"? I'm at work in my university, using its 
> infrastructure.

..excellent, talk to your support staff, they are paid handsomely
precisely to help/support you.

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.
_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng

Reply via email to