On Sat, 28 Dec 2019 23:11:16 +1100 Andrew McGlashan via Dng <dng@lists.dyne.org> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > Hi, > > On 28/12/19 9:03 pm, Alexis PM via Dng wrote: > > A mediocre result, neither good nor bad. The best option for people > > who don't want to use systemd, Option 6 "E: Support for multiple > > init systems is Required", came in last. But Option 1 "F: Focus on > > systemd" came in second place, if it had won it would have been a > > tragedy. > > It's completely broken when only one group of interested parties have > the only say; DDs should be ashamed. Another wasted opportunity to > make things right has been blown and there probably won't be any other > opportunity afforded ever again :( > > Debian needs to somehow find a way to include users (especially > sysadmins) in a meaningful way in votes of such significance. > > A. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > > iHUEAREIAB0WIQTJAoMHtC6YydLfjUOoFmvLt+/i+wUCXgdGXQAKCRCoFmvLt+/i > +z4mAP4x7ateI5rKrp4KelB64iy5prRlmb7C5Dz6/QBaol4FLQEAk3FcV0Poiy+f > dJyq5lOuMZfEk7PvQlZluOU5bUKeeM4= > =oikP > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > _______________________________________________ > Dng mailing list > Dng@lists.dyne.org > https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng I know Devuan has been pretty much more or less 'to create a binary compatible Debian but without systemd', but at what point would it be determined that the best course of action may be to leave Debian behind and continue our own way? Probably won't happen any time soon due to manpower issues but it's worth thinking about. -- _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng