There is a growing schism between the Qt Company and the opensource community.
The Qt Company published a blog post (https://www.qt.io/blog/qt-offering-changes-2020) reading: > From February onward, everyone, including open-source Qt users, will require > valid Qt accounts to download Qt binary packages. We changed this because we > think that a Qt account lets you make the best use of our services and > contribute to Qt as an open-source user. We want open-source users to help > improve Qt in one form or another, be that through bug reports, forums, code > reviews, or similar. These are currently only accessible from a Qt account, > which is why having one will become mandatory. To which the Qt Foundation answered with: https://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-community/2020q2/006098.html This was in April, since then I don't know. Ludovic On 28/09/20 03:29, Hendrik Boom wrote: > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 01:35:55AM +0200, aitor_czr wrote: >> On 27/9/20 13:59, g4sra via Dng wrote: >>> I have reservations about where QT5 is going, despite any issue with >>> pulseaudio, now might be a good time to jump ship. > > I've been wondering about QT5, but haven't been able to pinpint what makes me > uneasy. Care to elaborate? > > -- hendrik > >> >> +1
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng