On Friday 26 March 2021 at 13:07:08, Alessandro Vesely via Dng wrote: > Hi All, > > Debian is engaging in a disgusting attack against RMS: > https://www.debian.org/vote/2021/vote_002 > > Does Devuan have resolutions to sign open letters? > I'd propose to sign this one instead: > https://rms-support-letter.github.io/
Personally I agree with the latter letter, and feel that the Debian resolution is an over-reaction, to put it mildly. The Debian project can choose not to recognise him or his ways of expressing his opinions if they wish, but I agree that he is still entitled to hold and express those opinions, and each person or organisation those opinions affect can decide for themselves whether to agree with him. > See also: > An orthodox analysis entitled Justice for Dr. Richard Matthew Stallman, > which recaps the whole story. > https://jorgemorais.gitlab.io/justice-for-rms/ > > A post, written by Hannah Wolfman-Jones, with a response from civil-rights > expert Nadine Strossen, former president of the ACLU. > https://www.wetheweb.org/post/cancel-we-the-web I think that's too thoroughly-researched and competently written for the Debian Project Secretary to give it due consideration :( They don't want a reasoned debate - they want to tell people what to do. Antony. -- There are 10 types of people in the world: those who understand binary notation, and those who don't. Please reply to the list; please *don't* CC me. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
