On Fri, Jul 30, 2021 at 11:32:51PM +0200, Arnt Karlsen wrote: > On Fri, 30 Jul 2021 16:35:52 +0200, Didier wrote in message > <74e5400a-5e8c-4a22-d673-5f181644e...@in2p3.fr>: > > > Le 29/07/2021 à 20:10, Andreas Messer a écrit : > > > On Wed, Jul 28, 2021 at 03:58:02PM +0200, Didier Kryn wrote: > > > > > >> Similarly, more investment should be put in software so as to > > >> make a review of available languages suited for mssion-critical > > >> applications and invest in learning the chosen language. C and C++ > > >> are so error-prone that they are really not suited. > > > Well, you can implement bugs in any kind of language. To be honest, > > > crashes are the most easy ones to find. I know there are other > > > languages outside but here applies the same as above: I'm not the > > > one to decide. > > Not all language are equal. Some really discourage bad > > programming, meaning it takes a big effort to actually program > > badly/unsafely, while it is still possible. Others open traps under > > your feet everywhere. > > ..2 lists on these 2 kindsa programming languages would be nice.
I like to use the safest programming language that is compatible with the functions the program is to perform. -- hendrik _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng