On 2021-11-17 19:57:08, Steve Litt wrote: > Florian Zieboll via Dng said on Wed, 17 Nov 2021 23:37:44 +0100 > > >Inspired by earlier mails in the original "usr merge"-thread, an > >experiment I had been thinking of for a sleepless night was installing > >busybox in an initramfs. I suspect Steve facepalming, but be assured: > >This is canceled now. > > I will never, ever, EVER facepalm over somebody doing DIY > experimentation. Now, when you speak of initramfs or of busybox, you > speak with authority. You've taken a step forward from the dwobes > parroting the nonsense mouthed by others in their party. > > I was even hoping that with Busybox inside an initramfs, you'd have > created an "initramfs lite" that's simple to understand, debug and use. > In other words, I was hoping you'd prove me wrong :-). It has > consistently been people doing what you did that caused me to change my > mind.
Um, initramfs already uses busybox. Or it can, it's an option in initramfs-tools. -- A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world. _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
