On 29 Nov 2021, at 01:07, tito via Dng <dng@lists.dyne.org> wrote:
On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 07:20:14 -0600
o1bigtenor via Dng <dng@lists.dyne.org> wrote:
Greetings
In anticipation of a fiber optical connection (moving from a wireless) I
have been planning out and purchasing some bits of hardware. Am finding
that networking is, at least sure seems to be, another black hole
for time
and effort.
TL;DR (skip to last paragraphs for the question(s))
At present this is a soho office kind of installation but that will
slowly
be morphing into something that is at least somewhat larger. There are a
number of input sensor locations being worked on some of which would be
generating, initially at least, up to 15 data streams sampled possibly
every second (some maybe more often - - - decisions aren't all done
as yet)
so there will be a fair amount of data running around on my network
which
I'm trying to keep largely a wired affair.
At this point I'm working on the three entry bits of hardware (and their
software) - - - the router, hardware firewall, and the managed
switch. The
initial hockup on the fiber system is going to be at 250 Mbps sysmetric.
For the router I'm planning on using OpenWRT running on a Nanopi r4s
which
according to the folks over on openwrt capable of even very close to
full
Gbps speeds (IIRC tested to some 918 Mbps) which would give some
headroom
for future increases although I don't see a need for the foreseeable
future.
For the switch I have found myself a XyZel 1900-48 that I'm working on
getting OpenWRT on. This ability to run a managed switch on OpenWRT is
somewhat new but its open source and I'm not tied (I don't think) to
OpenWRT - - - - except I don't know any other real alternative - - - so
that's not a difficult solution either. I don't 'need' 48 ports but
I have
16 at present on a hub and its almost full and that's for stuff only
here
in the orifice (sic!). I also want the capabilities of forcing streaming
services and wireless communications to not collect any more data
from any
other part of the network (using VLANs) as is possible.
Then lastly to the hardware firewall.
I've been looking at pfsense and opnsense. Both are ipv6 possible
although
both are mostly focused on ipv4 at the present. IPfire seems to have
gotten
itself into a holding pattern and is not continuing work toward ipv6
functionality. Any one of these options are producing headaches when I'm
trying to figure out how to configure them - - - nothing installed at
present, just researching so far.
So - - - - questions - - - -
1. is my splitting the network system into the three parts a good
idea or
should I truncate parts 1 and 2 into the router? If you would please
give
reasons - - - please?
Hi,
If you want to have reliability splitting is good, if the router breaks
you still have a working firewall and switch and so on.
If you want also some redundancy you should think of buying
two of everything:
2 routers
2 firewalls
2 switches (2 x24 rather than 1x48 ports)
I personally prefer x86 hardware for this kind of things
when I see that little boxes like the Nanopi R4S they make me
think about toys. In my case sadly I'm tied to adsl over pots
so for the modem I still need to use this little plastic blackboxes.
In your case I would swap the nanopi for a nice mini-itx board
with intel nics, a sfx/flex psu (or pico psu), 4-8 gb of ram and a well
ventilated case (with low noise Noctua fans).
2. are there any good sources for information on and about networking?
debian has moved to nftables from iptables - - - is devuan doing
similar?
I think so.
Where does one find information to enable a firewall that works yet
isn't stupid?
I use arno-iptables-firewall It is easy to create a basic setup for
your network,
reliable, comes with good defaults and can easily be tweaked (for
port-forwarding,
vpns, geoip filtering and so on, don't know about vlans as don't use
them yet).
(I've wondered about having some kind of easy 'switch' that when
users left
their systems that the system wouldn't be calling home in the
overnight at
least a la ms googly. Dunno if that's 'simple' or not - - - so much to
learn and so little time to do it all in!)
TIA
Ciao,
Tito
