On 2012-07-30, at 19:01, Vernon Schryver <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm very disappointed. It seems that despite years of talk, DANE is > not ready for discussion in the trade press blogs, not to mention prime > time.
Dane was chartered less than two years ago, and before that did not exist (at least with the "dane" name). Although it no doubt feels like the buzzwords have been in circulation for "years" given the frequency with which they are present in marketing incantations, in reality dane is a somewhat small child. If it's a realistic option to publish information in the DNS which allows regular people with regular browsers to gain benefit from TLS without using the browser list some time in the next five years, I would call that "dramatic success". Joe _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
