On Oct 18, 2012, at 5:56 PM, Mark Andrews <[email protected]> wrote: > > In message <[email protected]>, sandoche BALAKRICHENAN writes: >> Hi Paul, >> >> I have deliberately added a bogus RRSIG record to >> "https://dane-broken.rd.nic.fr";. But the firefox add-on seems to >> successfully validate mentioning "the domain is secured by DNSSEC". >> >> Sandoche. > > Well the TLSA is secure. As long as that matches the CERT returned it *is* > secured even if the RRSIG on the A RRset is broken.
Ooooh… This is an interesting case (which I personally hadn't considered)... This all makes sense, but "feels" odd… Not proposing that we do anything, but it did make me blink…. W > > ; <<>> DiG 9.10.0pre-alpha <<>> _443._tcp.dane-broken.rd.nic.fr tlsa +dnssec > ;; global options: +cmd > ;; Got answer: > ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 52053 > ;; flags: qr rd ra ad; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 > > ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: > ; EDNS: version: 0, flags: do; udp: 4096 > ;; QUESTION SECTION: > ;_443._tcp.dane-broken.rd.nic.fr. IN TLSA > > ;; ANSWER SECTION: > _443._tcp.dane-broken.rd.nic.fr. 1 IN TLSA 3 0 1 > 6E013C54DF90D42D3C016E1AC9EB21E6DA45403D3A5AE9B2D8F21FC3 600D409C > _443._tcp.dane-broken.rd.nic.fr. 1 IN RRSIG TLSA 5 6 1 20130415134103 > 20121017134103 24975 dane-broken.rd.nic.fr. > UFaeHhxVp8zy1tpcR049JqGEvNZrmDLkpgoo63v4gvEtwLp0KRbSBL5J > vVlNnz8s5Uk68i8diY/zGt1epP72C2S6C3AUHKdYZiwvxBQwd34Sawna > jZMjfAkXEH5z9cjkk1AVm0ReRPs9kbVc0iPDLcH+z21VJBZyFmloOflM EXU= > > ;; Query time: 838 msec > ;; SERVER: 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) > ;; WHEN: Fri Oct 19 08:49:24 2012 > ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 288 > > >> On 09/12/2012 10:44 PM, Paul Wouters wrote: >>> On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Marco Davids (SIDN) wrote: >>> >>>> On 08/23/12 20:02, Paul Wouters wrote: >>>> >>>>> I put up the xpi as well, you can grab it at: >>>>> http://people.redhat.com/pwouters/mozilla-extval-0.7.xpi >>>> >>>> I like it. >>>> >>>> However, there might be room for improvent in the wording of the the >>>> messages. >>>> >>>> I deliberately broke the TLSA record (https://forfun.net/) and the >>>> message is (in green): >>>> >>>> "Domainname is secured by DNSSEC and the certificate is validated by >>>> CA." >>>> >>>> Both true, but as a paranoid user, I would have appreciated a little bit >>>> more information, like: >>>> >>>> "... but the certificate did not pass a DANE check" >>>> >>>> (or something similar) >>> >>> It should do that. When I check your domain it tells me there is no TLSA >>> record, but I checked all name servers and it is there (and incorrect) >>> >>> I'll add it on my TODO list :) >>> >>> Paul >>> _______________________________________________ >>> dns-operations mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations >>> dns-jobs mailing list >>> https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dane mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane > -- > Mark Andrews, ISC > 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia > PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: [email protected] > _______________________________________________ > dane mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane > -- After you'd known Christine for any length of time, you found yourself fighting a desire to look into her ear to see if you could spot daylight coming the other way. -- (Terry Pratchett, Maskerade) _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list [email protected] https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
