On 2013-03-27, at 14:39, Thomas Mieslinger <[email protected]> wrote:

> --snip--
> We have corrected the issue that was blocking email/MX queries to US domain 
> names from Europe.
> 
> Neustar had noticed a MX spike in it's servers in Europe over the weekend, 
> and to stop any negative effects, we placed those servers in mitigation. We 
> have modified the mitigation to block all inbound MX queries from recursive 
> servers with the recursive bit turned off, and all email from Europe to .US 
> domain names will now be delivered correctly.
> --snap--

That seems like a curious mitigation tactic.

I don't think it's a reasonable characterisation to link the availability of 
European-based authoritative servers to the ability for Europeans to send mail 
to Americans. So long as *some* authoritative servers for .us were responding, 
and so long as the "mitigation" didn't involve returning false answers, mail 
would still be delivered; just the recursive MX lookup would take longer.

I would worry, though, that timing out on MX queries specifically would cause 
use of those European nameservers to be suppressed for other RRTypes, too. That 
would amount to a wholesale shifting of query traffic from European .us 
nameservers to those elsewhere without the "mitigation".

The apparent availability and non-availability of those particular servers from 
the point of view of caches would make capacity planning difficult. The 
difficulty in diagnosing problems at end-sites is already evident.

There are a lot of moving parts there, and a lot of unpredictable behaviours. I 
wouldn't have taken that approach to defend against MX spikes.


Joe

_______________________________________________
dns-operations mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
dns-jobs mailing list
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs

Reply via email to