Rubens Kuhl <rube...@nic.br> wrote: > > It was curious to see that a to-be-unnamed TLD registry, a newcomer to > the scene many years after the holy wars that ended up defining the > current RFCs, writing completely new code, mentioned that they found > attributes to be a better option, but decided to go with host objects > due to registrar support. This doesn't prove which way is better, but > for me it indicates that the role in the value chain can play a part in > which option is preferred.
Nominet is another example along those lines: alongside the .uk namespace change they have switched to a more standard EPP implementation. http://registrars.nominet.org.uk/namespace/uk/registration-and-domain-management/registrar-systems/epp http://registrars.nominet.org.uk/content/what-are-differences-between-nominet-epp-and-standard-epp Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ Trafalgar: Cyclonic in northwest, otherwise mainly northerly or northwesterly 5 or 6. Slight or moderate. Showers in northwest. Good. _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
