> On Jun 9, 2015, at 23:35 , Dave Warren <da...@hireahit.com> wrote: > To me, the main problem isn't verifying the nameservers before delegation, > but rather, the fact that an authoritative server cannot reliably get > themselves removed once delegation is established. At most, an authoritative > server operator can return bad data to attempt to disrupt the zone owner's > rightful use, but in the case of a high traffic DNSBL which has been > abandoned, there's little an authoritative server operator can do about the > flood of traffic.
In the (very rare) case of my name servers receiving unwanted traffic in this way, I’ve treated it as an abuse issue. Report to abuse@ the organization that’s doing the delegation that they’re generating undated traffic. So far that’s worked, but I haven’t yet had to email a gTLD registry. _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
