In article <22698cb2-ef91-f783-bc53-6f028cc6a...@nic.cz> you write: >On 30. 03. 20 12:35, Meir Kraushar via dns-operations wrote: >> - Obviously resolver compliance is very important (Knot support is >> questionable?) > >We intend to release fix in 5.1.0 release, probably next week: >https://gitlab.labs.nic.cz/knot/knot-resolver/-/merge_requests/965 > >I'm sorry for being late to the DNAME party.
It's only been 20 years. The party's hardly gotten started. R's, John _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
