--- Begin Message ---
Hi Paul,
On 11 May 2026, at 16:10, Paul Hoffman wrote:
> This discussion tracks the extensive discussion in the DNSOP WG that led to
> RFC 7646, https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc7646/. If people want to
> revisit the recommendations in that RFC, please consider writing an Internet
> Draft that updates RFC 7646 in specific ways, and bringing that draft to the
> DNSOP WG in the IETF instead of just having the discussion here.
>
> Note that I'm not suggesting that this actually be done: I believe that the
> discussion that led to RFC 7646 came to consensus, even though it was
> particularly rough and diverse. I'm suggesting that if there is interest to
> revisit the RFC, that conversation should be in the venue that could actually
> update the RFC.
>
I'm not sure that RFC 7646 needs updating. The discussion I've started is about
getting enough information during an incident to be able to decide about using
an NTA. Maybe we'll get a BCP RFC from that discussion, but I first want to see
if there are other people seeing the need of additional work.
I will talk with people during RIPE 92 and see if there are others that see
something missing in the DNSSEC puzzle.
Greetings
Carsten
--- End Message ---
_______________________________________________
dns-operations mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations
