Proposed text looks good to me.

-Tiru

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dns-privacy [mailto:dns-privacy-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Sara
> Dickinson
> Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2017 4:34 PM
> To: dns-privacy@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [dns-privacy] review of 
> draft-ietf-dprive-dtls-and-tls-profiles-11:
> we should revert DNSSEC validation requirement
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> This draft is now ready to progress once a -12 version is available. I just 
> want
> to circle back round to summarise the fact that the only proposed difference
> that will be in the -12 version compared to -11 is the following (in section 
> 7.2.
> Direct configuration of ADN only):
> 
> Current text:
> 
> “It can then use Opportunistic DNS connections to an untrusted recursive
>    DNS resolver to establish the IP address of the intended privacy-
>    enabling DNS resolver by doing a lookup of A/AAAA records.  Such
>    records SHOULD be DNSSEC validated when using a Strict Usage profile
>    and MUST be validated when using Opportunistic Privacy."
> 
> New text:
> “It can then use Opportunistic DNS connections to an untrusted recursive
>    DNS resolver to establish the IP address of the intended privacy-
>    enabling DNS resolver by doing a lookup of A/AAAA records. A
>    DNSSEC validating client SHOULD apply the same validation policy
>   to the A/AAAA meta-query lookups as it does to other queries.
>   A client that does not validate DNSSEC SHOULD apply the same policy (if any)
>   to the A/AAAA meta-query lookups as it does to other queries."
> 
> I hope I captured the consensus correctly? Please let me know as I intend to
> put out the -12 (final) version next Monday (20th).
> 
> Sara.
> 
> > On 31 Oct 2017, at 16:12, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoff...@vpnc.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 31 Oct 2017, at 8:06, Sara Dickinson wrote:
> >
> >> So maybe “A DNSSEC validating client SHOULD apply the same validation
> policy to the A/AAAA meta-query lookup as it does to other queries.”?
> >
> > That could be misinterpreted to indicate that there has to be some positive
> validation policy. How about:
> >   A DNSSEC validating client SHOULD apply the same validation policy
> >   to the A/AAAA meta-query lookup as it does to other queries.
> >   A client that does not validate DNSSEC SHOULD apply any policy it
> >   has to the A/AAAA meta-query lookup.
> > --Paul Hoffman
> 
> _______________________________________________
> dns-privacy mailing list
> dns-privacy@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
_______________________________________________
dns-privacy mailing list
dns-privacy@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy

Reply via email to