Hi Romeo & NCC DNS team - first of all, congrats to the addition of resilience to the NCC's DNS services! Good to have this aboard these days, I (unfortunately have to) think...
On 18.10.2016 10:54, Romeo Zwart wrote: > [...] > > The proposal submitted by VeriSign Sàrl (“Verisign”) was the best fit. > We subsequently signed a contract with Verisign, which comes into effect > before the end of this year. The contract is for the period of one year, > with the intention to renew yearly. Prior to renewal, we will look at > the benefits of the service and actual market situation at that time to > decide on renewing the service. in the light of transparency, will resp. can the contract be disclosed? If not, is it a contract (draft) that has been put on the table by the NCC? Or, vice versa, VeriSign's standard contract for such services? Or rather - as a result of heavy negotiations in smoke filled rooms behind closed doors ;-) - an amalgam of both? Also, how (far) the three final bidders met the RfP requirements would be interesting. I don't mind if the names of the non-winning two would be anonymized. Thanks & best, -C.