Subject: [dns-wg] Re: [Ext] Re: Reverse DNS Date: Wed, May 13, 2026 at 01:57:55PM +0200 Quoting Peter Eckel via dns-wg ([email protected]): > > Anyway, maybe some more people can join in and tell what they are using? > > For my part, where I need to do RFC 2317 I prefer the form > > 0-63.2.0.192.in-addr.arpa > 64-127.2.0.192.in-addr.arpa > 128-191.2.0.192.in-addr.arpa > 192-255.2.0.192.in-addr.arpa > > Advantage is that the characters are more conventional than the example stuff > from the RFC, and you see at first glance which addresses are included in the > delegated zone.
This is what I prefer, and have a couple times forwarded as more-or-less gospel to some operators who were a bit baffled by the functionality. IIRC Infoblox does something similar. /Måns, classless. -- Måns Nilsson primary/secondary/besserwisser/machina MN-1334-RIPE SA0XLR +46 705 989668 Xerox your lunch and file it under "sex offenders"!
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
----- To unsubscribe from this mailing list or change your subscription options, please visit: https://mailman.ripe.net/mailman3/lists/dns-wg.ripe.net/ As we have migrated to Mailman 3, you will need to create an account with the email matching your subscription before you can change your settings. More details at: https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/mailman-3-migration/
