dnsmasq-discuss  

Messages by Thread

• [Dnsmasq-discuss] DNSmasq issue Shwetha via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DNSmasq issue Monthly Posting
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq running Shwetha via Dnsmasq-discuss
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] dhcp-host ipv6 not get assigned yet ipv4 does Glen Huang
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dhcp-host ipv6 not get assigned yet ipv4 does Glen Huang
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dhcp-host ipv6 not get assigned yet ipv4 does Geert Stappers
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] Bug? no-negcache set but still instant status:REFUSE w/ EDE: 23 (Network Error). mo via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Bug? no-negcache set but still instant status:REFUSE w/ EDE: 23 (Network Error). mo via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Bug? no-negcache set but still instant status:REFUSE w/ EDE: 23 (Network Error). Geert Stappers
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] Possible to enable DNSSEC only for specific upstream servers? Kevin P. Fleming
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Possible to enable DNSSEC only for specific upstream servers? wkitty42
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Possible to enable DNSSEC only for specific upstream servers? Kevin P. Fleming
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] NS record Geert Stappers
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] Problem with auth and sub-domain servers Roger Lucas via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Problem with auth and sub-domain servers after chain extension Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Problem with auth and sub-domain servers after chain extension Roger Lucas via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Problem with auth and sub-domain servers after chain extension Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Problem with auth and sub-domain servers Buck Horn via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Problem with auth and sub-domain servers Roger Lucas via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Problem with auth and sub-domain servers Buck Horn via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Problem with auth and sub-domain servers Roger Lucas via Dnsmasq-discuss
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH 0/6] Fix RNG entropy reuse, replace SURF with ChaCha8 Leonid Evdokimov
  • [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH 6/6] Use ChaCha8-based {rand16, rand32, rand64} Leonid Evdokimov
  • [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH 1/6] Fix -Wshadow: rand64() was mistakenly using its own counter O_o Leonid Evdokimov
  • [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH 2/6] Make in128++ branchless in SURF rand() Leonid Evdokimov
  • [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH 4/6] Rekey PRNG on fork() to avoid sharing PRNG state and/or leaking it Leonid Evdokimov
  • [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH 5/6] Reseed with getentropy() ~hourly to avoid low-entropy on boot Leonid Evdokimov
  • [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH 3/6] Use getentropy() if possible to reduce code duplication a bit Leonid Evdokimov
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Fix RNG entropy reuse, replace SURF with ChaCha8 Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Fix RNG entropy reuse, replace SURF with ChaCha8 Leonid Evdokimov
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Fix RNG entropy reuse, replace SURF with ChaCha8 Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Fix RNG entropy reuse, replace SURF with ChaCha8 Leonid Evdokimov
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Fix RNG entropy reuse, replace SURF with ChaCha8 Geert Stappers
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] socket activation support (systemd) kuehn.michael--- via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] socket activation support (systemd) Petr Menšík
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] socket activation support (systemd) Geert Stappers
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] forward.c: fix handling of truncated response Rahul Thakur via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] forward.c: fix handling of truncated response Geert Stappers
  • [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] forward.c: fix handling of truncated response Rahul Thakur via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] forward.c: fix handling of truncated response Rahul Thakur via Dnsmasq-discuss
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] DNS resolving error White, Phil via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DNS resolving error Geert Stappers
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH 1/1] forward.c: fix handling of truncated response Rahul Thakur via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH 1/1] forward.c: fix handling of truncated response Simon Kelley
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH 1/1] forward.c: fix handling of truncated response Rahul Thakur via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] forward.c: fix handling of truncated response Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH 1/1] forward.c: fix handling of truncated response Petr Menšík
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH 1/1] forward.c: fix handling of truncated response Dominik Derigs via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH 1/1] forward.c: fix handling of truncated response Simon Kelley
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] dnsmasq 2.47 introduced a work-around for errant Windows behaviour, in that it did not assign IP addresses ending in .255 or .0 within the class c range even when using supernetting. 15 years on, the Windows versions that were broken in this way have reached end of support, and so we can now swing these addresses into use. Jan Ceuleers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] dnsmasq 2.47 introduced a work-around for errant Windows behaviour, in that it did not assign IP addresses ending in .255 or .0 within the class c range even when using supernetting. 15 years on, the Windows versions that were broken in this way have reached end of support, and so we can now swing these addresses into use. Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] dnsmasq 2.47 introduced a work-around for errant Windows behaviour, in that it did not assign IP addresses ending in .255 or .0 within the class c range even when using supernetting. 15 years on, the Windows versions that were broken in this way have reached end of support, and so we can now swing these addresses into use. Petr Menšík
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] dnsmasq 2.47 introduced a work-around for errant Windows behaviour, in that it did not assign IP addresses ending in .255 or .0 within the class c range even when using supernetting. 15 years on, the Windows versions that were broken in this way have reached end of support, and so we can now swing these addresses into use. Geert Stappers
  • [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] dhcp.c: Updated comment lines Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] dnsmasq 2.47 introduced a work-around for errant Windows behaviour, in that it did not assign IP addresses ending in .255 or .0 within the class c range even when using supernetting. 15 years on, the Windows versions that were broken in this way have reached end of support, and so we can now swing these addresses into use. Petr Menšík
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] Question on dnsmasq code, which may occur a bad-free 胡义臻
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Question on dnsmasq code, tests Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Question on dnsmasq code, tests Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Regarding dnsmasq 胡义臻
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Question on dnsmasq code, which may occur a bad-free Simon Kelley
  • [Dnsmasq-discuss] Welcome back and waiting patches Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] and waiting patches Geert Stappers
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] Specific treatment of Class C addresses Jan Ceuleers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Specific treatment of Class C addresses Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Specific treatment of Class C addresses Jan Ceuleers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Specific treatment of Class C addresses Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Specific treatment of Class C addresses Simon Kelley
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Specific treatment of Class C addresses Wink Saville
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Specific treatment of Class C addresses Wink Saville
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Specific treatment of Class C addresses Jan Ceuleers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Specific treatment of Class C addresses Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Specific treatment of Class C addresses Simon Kelley
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Specific treatment of Class C addresses Jan Ceuleers
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] pxe-service entries in dnsmasq conf seem to fail non-proxy EFI boot Shrenik Bhura
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] Monthly Posting, September edition Monthly Posting
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] Regression in 2.90 when addn-hosts has an IPv4 but not an IPv6 address Casey Tucker via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Regression in 2.90 when addn-hosts has an IPv4 but not an IPv6 address Sven Geuer
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Regression in 2.90 when addn-hosts has an IPv4 but not an IPv6 address Casey Tucker via Dnsmasq-discuss
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq in docker container Danil Smirnov
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq in docker container Dimitry Andric
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq in docker container Dominik Derigs via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq in docker container Danil Smirnov
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq in docker container, why and what Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq in docker container, why and what Danil Smirnov
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq in docker container, why and what Dimitry Andric
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq in docker container, why and what Danil Smirnov
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq in docker container, why and what Danil Smirnov
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq in docker container, why and what Danil Smirnov
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq in docker container at 9:10 Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq in docker container Danil Smirnov
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq in docker container 0zl
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq in docker container Danil Smirnov
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] issue when combined using addn-hosts= and nftset= sam
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] Forwarding UDP requests to TCP, some other concerns Corey Minyard
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Forwarding UDP requests to TCP, some other concerns imnozi
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Forwarding UDP requests to TCP, some other concerns Corey Minyard
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Forwarding UDP requests to TCP, some other concerns Buck Horn via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Forwarding UDP requests to TCP, some other concerns Corey Minyard
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Forwarding UDP requests to TCP, some other concerns Buck Horn via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Forwarding UDP requests to TCP, some other concerns Corey Minyard
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Forwarding UDP requests to TCP, some other concerns list-dnsmasq-discuss--- via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Forwarding UDP requests to TCP, some other concerns Simon Kelley
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Forwarding UDP requests to TCP, some other concerns Corey Minyard
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Forwarding UDP requests to TCP, some other concerns Alex Malinovich via Dnsmasq-discuss
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] CNAME not resolving for external domain Alex Malinovich via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] CNAME not resolving for external domain Buck Horn via Dnsmasq-discuss
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] Example for connmark based iltering Uwe Schindler
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Example for connmark based filtering Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Example for connmark based filtering Uwe Schindler
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] Patch for IANA KSK 2024 Loganaden Velvindron
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Patch for IANA KSK 2024 wkitty42
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Patch for IANA KSK 2024 Loganaden Velvindron
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Patch for IANA KSK 2024 Gary R. Schmidt via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Patch for IANA KSK 2024 Peter van Dijk
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Patch for IANA KSK 2024 Gary R. Schmidt via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Add IANA Root TA 2024. Geert Stappers
  • [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] trust-anchors.conf: nitpicking Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Patch for IANA KSK 2024 Geert Stappers
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] all-servers option not working for dnssec-query queries Niels Hendriks
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] all-servers option not working for dnssec-query queries Geert Stappers
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] IPv6 resolve local only Klaus Vink Slott via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] IPv6 resolve local only Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] IPv6 resolve local only Matus UHLAR - fantomas
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] IPv6 resolve local only Klaus Vink Slott via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] IPv6 resolve local only Petr Menšík
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] IPv6 resolve local only Klaus Vink Slott via Dnsmasq-discuss
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] ipset skbinfo support feature Lucas via Dnsmasq-discuss
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] A segmentation fault occurred in dnsmasq renmingshuai via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] A segmentation fault occurred in dnsmasq renmingshuai via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] A segmentation fault occurred in dnsmasq renmingshuai via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] A segmentation fault occurred in dnsmasq Geert Stappers
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] Feature request - log only once for dhcpdiscover ignored macs Salatiel Filho
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Feature request - log only once for dhcpdiscover ignored macs Alex Malinovich via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Feature request - log only once for dhcpdiscover ignored macs Donald Muller
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] IPv6 and domain name with ntp-server option Yeoh via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] IPv6 and domain name with ntp-server option Buck Horn via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] IPv6 and domain name with ntp-server option Yeoh via Dnsmasq-discuss
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] A segmentation fault occurred in dnsmasq renmingshuai via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] A segmentation fault occurred in dnsmasq Dominik Derigs via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] A segmentation fault occurred in dnsmasq renmingshuai via Dnsmasq-discuss
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Fix syscall param, sendmsg(msg.msg_control) pointing to uninitialised bytes Dominik Derigs via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Fix syscall param, sendmsg(msg.msg_control) pointing to uninitialised bytes Geert Stappers
  • [Dnsmasq-discuss] patches Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] patches Dan Schaper via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] patches Geert Stappers
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] DNR: DHCP options 144 and 162 for DoH/DoT/DoQ Wes Turner
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] DNR: DHCP options 144 and 162 for DoH/DoT/DoQ Wes Turner
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] Experimental python binding Petr Menšík
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Experimental python binding Geert Stappers
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] strict-order and EDNS0 Karel Bílek
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] How to NOT bind dnsmasq to lo? Tim Tassonis
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] How to NOT bind dnsmasq to lo? Buck Horn via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] How to NOT bind dnsmasq to lo? Tim Tassonis
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] How to NOT bind dnsmasq to lo? Tim Tassonis
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] How to NOT bind dnsmasq to lo? Sven Geuer
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] How to NOT bind dnsmasq to lo? Tim Tassonis
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] How to NOT bind dnsmasq to lo? Sven Geuer
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] How to NOT bind dnsmasq to lo? Tim Tassonis
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] Blocking DHCPv6 requests from a specific client Alex Malinovich via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Blocking DHCPv6 requests from a specific client Alasdair Muckart via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Blocking DHCPv6 requests from a specific client Alex Malinovich via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Blocking DHCPv6 requests from a specific client burton
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Blocking DHCPv6 requests from a specific client Alex Malinovich via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Blocking DHCPv6 requests from a specific client Geert Stappers
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] dnsmasq + huge number of domains or hosts Leonid Evdokimov
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] High CPU Usage by dnsmasq 姚培炜
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] High CPU Usage by dnsmasq Dimitry Andric
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] Consultation Request on IPv6 RDNSS in Dnsmasq Nomad Chen
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Consultation Request on IPv6 RDNSS in Dnsmasq Uwe Schindler
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] making the internet work since 1999 Geert Stappers
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] nftset not always applied to AAAA Heorhi Valakhanovich
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] How do you add a nameserver from the command line? CHOPPERGIRL via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] How do you add a nameserver from the command line? Geert Stappers
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] Nonexistent AAAA records return NXDOMAIN instead of NODATA Dimitry Andric
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Nonexistent AAAA records return NXDOMAIN instead of NODATA Buck Horn via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Nonexistent AAAA records return NXDOMAIN instead of NODATA Dimitry Andric
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Nonexistent AAAA records return NXDOMAIN instead of NODATA Sven Geuer
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Nonexistent AAAA records return NXDOMAIN instead of NODATA Buck Horn via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Nonexistent AAAA records return NXDOMAIN instead of NODATA Dimitry Andric
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] Can dnsmasq forward queries while preventing the forwarding of update requests? Wei-Ting Lin
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] New query type WALLET Dominik Derigs via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] New query type WALLET Dominik Derigs via Dnsmasq-discuss
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Fix double free() corruption due to config Dominik Derigs via Dnsmasq-discuss
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] string dhcp options Matthias Lay via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] string dhcp options Matthias Lay via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] string dhcp options Buck Horn via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] string dhcp options Matthias Lay via Dnsmasq-discuss
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] How to achieve multiple DHCP pools within a single broadcast domain? David via Dnsmasq-discuss
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] Getting odd (IPV6) error on Ubuntu 24.04 system, not on similar 23.10 system Chris Green
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] Getting odd (IPV6) error on Ubuntu 24.04 system, not on similar 23.10 system Matus UHLAR - fantomas
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] How to create /etc/resolv.conf after removing systemd-resolved? Chris Green
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] How to create /etc/resolv.conf after removing systemd-resolved? Buck Horn via Dnsmasq-discuss
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] How to create /etc/resolv.conf after removing systemd-resolved? Chris Green
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] How to create /etc/resolv.conf after removing systemd-resolved? Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] How to create /etc/resolv.conf after removing systemd-resolved? Petr Menšík
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] How to create /etc/resolv.conf after removing systemd-resolved? Chris Green
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Static analysis minor issue fixes Petr Menšík
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Static analysis minor issue fixes Geert Stappers
  • Re: [Dnsmasq-discuss] [PATCH] Static analysis minor issue fixes Geert Stappers
• [Dnsmasq-discuss] interface-name potential bug Ondrej Pirko via Dnsmasq-discuss

• Earlier messages