Davide Ferrari wrote: > El Viernes, 1 de Diciembre de 2006 17:31, Simon Kelley escribió: >> This is a sort-of-FAQ, but it's worth getting an explanation in one >> place which is up to date, as things have changed recently. > > Thanks for the detailed explanation! :) > So I can assume that this error was due to a not responding (at least enough > quickly) upstream nameserver, cannot I? I do have *lots* of DNS queries on > this dnsmasq.
Yes. If it's an ongoing problem, the best solution is to upgrade to version 2.35 and increase --dns-forward-max from the default 150. > > Thanks again. > (and thanks as well for the great program dnsmasq is!) My pleasure. Cheers, Simon. >
