On 9/17/07, ~ Kunal Sharma ~ <koolku...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Simon, > > Yes, I'm using 2.23, so its pretty old but I can't change it now for > certain reasons ! > > Thanks, > Kunal
May I inquire as to the rationale that allows modifications to dnsmasq but not upgrade to the latest version? On 9/14/07, Simon Kelley <si...@thekelleys.org.uk> wrote: > > > > ~ Kunal Sharma ~ wrote: > > > Hi Simon, > > > > > > Many thanks for replying. Basically, I'm trying to add support for the > > > DHCP requirements that are needed for DSL Forum's TR-111 standard, > > > in my gateway device. > > > > > > >The existing support for non-vendor-identifying encapsulated options > > is > > > >in two places. The data gets laid out in the packet in the second > > half > > > >of do_options() in src/rfc2131.c. > > > > > > I hope you're talking about do_opt() or do_req_options() because I > > don't > > > find do_options() in the code. > > > > I'm talking about do_options(). It sounds like you have an older > > release. The current release is 2.40. Unless you have very good reasons > > why not, it's best to work from that. > > > > > > > > And yes, I'm aware of GNU GPL. I just meant to make sure the author > > > does not place any proprietary licence. So. I'll definitely share the > > source > > > once I'm done with this. > > > > GPL v2 for all current releases. It's possible that future releases will > > be GPL v3, see current posts in this groups. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Simon. > > > > > > > > Thanks again, > > > Kunal > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list > Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk > http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss > >