Simon, thanks a lot for your answer. On Mon, 22 Nov 2010, at 15:05, Simon Kelley wrote:
> There's a tension between getting answers in the face of one or more > broken servers and even load distribution. Dnsmasq is written with > the former in mind, because that's most useful in niche is was > designed for, I guess. For one particular application I would have preferred some load balancing but that's not a big deal and I can live well with the fact that all servers for a specific domain are queried. Anyway, dnsmasq is doing a great job. Thanks for keeping it up, and thanks for the clarification, -- -- Andreas
