On 01/03/12 00:30, /dev/rob0 wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 08:05:41PM +0000, Simon Kelley wrote:
The DHCPv6 code is looking pretty good now (thanks all testers).
So good, in fact, that I think it's time to start moving gently
towards a release. I've just created 2.60rc1, available at
Just a thought ... having added DHCPv6, perhaps this warrants a major
release, i.e., 3.0? :)
I've thought about this, and the reason I didn't go for it is that the
addition of DHCPv6 has not changed any existing functionality. Unless
I've made a mistake, 2.60 should slot into any existing dnsmasq
configuration and just keep working. That's certainly the intention and
deliberately so.
I'd really like to do a non-backward-compatible 3.0 release and throw
away the bad design decisions that have accumulated over the years. I
may well do one at some point, but it won't be now, and I won't force
users to re-build their installations to get DHCPv6.
Cheers,
Simon.
_______________________________________________
Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list
Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk
http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
