> Configuration on a primary looks like > > --failover-listen= <port no> > > Configuration on a secondary looks like > > --failover-master=<IP of primary>,<port on primary>
I think more consideration should go into the configuration command names, since putting a "fallover-master" option on a secondary is counter-intuitive. After all, one doesn't put a "dhcp-authoritative" option on non-authoritative servers to tell them where to find the authoritative server. Also, shouldn't the standby/failover behavior be linked to authoritative? _______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
