Awesome. I love dnsmasq. BTW, re: the subnets, why would that be a problem? I have complete control over the router, I can change it, set up static routing, etc. if I ever need to connect the two subnets.
On Jul 21, 2012, at 4:18 PM, /dev/rob0 <r...@gmx.co.uk> wrote: > On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 12:49:38PM -0700, Craig Yoshioka wrote: >> Sorry, typo the lines should have been: >> >>> dhcp-host=eth0,myserver,192.168.0.10 >>> dhcp-host=eth1,myserver,192.168.1.10 >> >> On Jul 21, 2012, at 12:44 PM, Craig Yoshioka <crai...@me.com> wrote: >>> I have a server using two interfaces for different subnets, with >>> the same hostname on both. The subnets are: >>> 192.168.0.0/24 >>> 192.168.1.0/24 > > FWIW 192.168.0.0/23 are the worst possible choices because they > conflict with what most off-the-shelf routers use. If you ever need > to connect your networks to another, such as via a VPN, you might > find out why. > >>> I've gotten each interface to get the correct IP from dnsmasq using: >>> dhcp-host=eth0,myserver,192.168.0.10 >>> dhcp-host=eth0,myserver,192.168.1.10 >>> >>> but when dnsmasq is asked to resolve the address of myserver it >>> always answers with 192.168.1.10 regardless of what subnet the >>> request came from. >>> >>> What's the proper way to setup this up? > > See "-y, --localise-queries" in the dnsmasq(8) manual. > -- > http://rob0.nodns4.us/ -- system administration and consulting > Offlist GMX mail is seen only if "/dev/rob0" is in the Subject: > > _______________________________________________ > Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list > Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk > http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss _______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss