Hi, Regarding this message: http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2007q4/001640.html
> It's much more difficult than you might at first think, because of the > architecure of dnsmasq. A general solution (a search list of suffices to > check in order) is pretty much impossible. Adding a single suffix to bare > names is possible, but will need some new packet-manipulation code. Do you have any pointers on adding a single suffix to bare names and forwarding to an upstream server? Thanks, John
_______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
