On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 07:58:05PM +0100, Geert Stappers via Dnsmasq-discuss wrote: > Hi, > > > Another 17th day of the month. > > Patches for which it is unclear when they should resubmitted: > > * Offer alternative DHCPv6 address if requested is taken ( Petr Mensik )
First posted https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2021q3/015640.html Reposted https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q4/016637.html It would be a pity if another 14 months later we get again "Oh, this patch slipped through the cracks, reposting". > * Coding style ( Geert Stappers ) Was a concept, new version is on the back burner. > * Connection track mark based DNS query filtering Original submitter moved on, in https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q4/016685.html was a "would like to have", but no "have tried it, works for me". Request: We mark the patch as "archived after never been accepted and never been rejected" > * Make ECC-GOST ( Petr Mensik ) Simons review https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/pipermail/dnsmasq-discuss/2022q4/016697.html ends with "I don't think there's a need to be able to disable the GOST algorithms, but I'm happy to hear arguments to the contrary." Groeten Geert Stappers Attempting to express Software gets improved by patches, do not ignore patches. -- Silence is hard to parse _______________________________________________ Dnsmasq-discuss mailing list Dnsmasq-discuss@lists.thekelleys.org.uk https://lists.thekelleys.org.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dnsmasq-discuss
