Dear colleagues, This is the first of four mails about issues in the draft draft-ietf-dnsop-reverse-mapping-considerations, currently at version 01. We are attempting to clear the issues as quickly as possible to the satisfaction of the working group.
I believe that with the -01 draft, all the previously-logged issues are closed. If you disagree with this, please do speak up so that we can try to address remaining objections. Since -01 was posted, there are two issues that have surfaced, and a possible issue I am not sure what to do with. I name them here, but treat them in separate mails so that the conversations on these different issues will thread nicely. Issue 14: "accurate reverse" is emotionally-charged Issue 15: strengthen discussion of policy Possible issue: proposed text from Dean Anderson to resolve claimed ambiguity Best regards, A -- Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street Afilias Canada Toronto, Ontario Canada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> M2P 2A8 jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 416 646 3304 x4110 _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
