In the message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> dated Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 04:39:13PM +0000, Paul Vixie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So it is, in my view, in the case of leaking RFC 1918 addresses. Yes, it > will mean you can't always copy a config file and get expected behaviour. > Yes, it will break working configurations after a software upgrade. But, > for the good of the internet community, we have to be willing to do the > "tough love" thing from time to time.
All I can say is that I support to have such a configuration file provided in a BIND distribution (I don't know what is the *best* choice, but the Mark Andrews' one seems to me a good choice). Leaking RFC1918 addresses has been a chronic problem on the global Internet operation, and I welcome a proposal to reduce the chance of leakage. I think it's time for the sysadmins to learn a new thing. // Kenji Rikitake _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
