William F. Maton Sotomayor (wmaton) writes:
>
> I think it very may well be suited to that task, but are we crossing a line
> here that may result down a path we might regret later on. I think what
> would need to be worked out is what criteria would be used to declare a
> local or nonsense domain, nonsense or junk, and have that suitably delegated
> to AS112. It could go ad infinitum (ever word in every language), or it
> could be we need to take whatever floats to the top 25 of a domain lookup
> chart. Of course, someone needs to determine what makes a good sample to
> create that statistic.
The first step is to decide whether delegating to AS112 is reserved
to standardized (read: RFC) zones, like RFC1918, 169.254, etc..., or
whether anything sufficiently large -- and bogus -- is sufficient.
.local fits the latter criteria. But yes, it does make the requirement
criteria more fuzzy.
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
