> -----Original Message----- > From: dnsop-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:dnsop-boun...@ietf.org] > On Behalf Of Andrew Sullivan > Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2009 12:13 PM > To: dnsop@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [DNSOP] Stockholm meeting slot assignment CHANGED > > On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 02:37:09PM -0400, John Schnizlein wrote: > > > Now, what about this other draft that seems to call for recursive > > resolvers to know about address translation? > > http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-vogt-durand-virtual-ip6-connectivity-01.txt > > Clearly, it needs review ;-) Note that it's not a BEHAVE WG item yet. > Unfortunately, its time slot conflicts with the DNSOP meeting. > > Remember, anyway, work is supposed to be undertaken on the mailing > lists, so if we have an issue with a draft in some WG, we likely ought > to be taking our concerns to that WG's list and raising them.
I happened to notice this post and we were able to move draft-vogt-durand-virtual-ip6-connectivity to Tuesday, http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/75/agenda/behave.html Comments on the BEHAVE mailing list regarding the draft would certainly be welcome. Note there is a -02 of the draft which has more details especially around some DNS operations. A link to its location is in BEHAVE's agenda. -d _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
