Shane Kerr wrote: > Perhaps it makes sense to have two documents: > > 1. A document which says "you won't be able to pre-populate in IPv6 > reverse like you do in IPv4 - don't worry about it". > 2. A document which says "if you want to provide IPv6 reverse for > some reason, here are a plethora of ways to do it". > > Which is basically Doug's document, split into two. I think having two > makes sense, because otherwise we are confounding the pre-populating > issue with the issue of how to provide reverse in the brave, new IPv6 > world.
FYI, it's not my document, I was simply bringing it to the attention of those who (like me) were not at IETF75. That said I think that your idea of splitting into 2 topics is a good idea. I personally would also like to see less "political" commentary on the value of rDNS. Doug _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
