In message <89290757-1889-4cc1-9879-40115fd82...@virtualized.org>, David Conrad writes: > Stephane, > > On Sep 8, 2009, at 1:32 PM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote: > > You use the plural but there is today only one DLV registry in active > > use. > > I was told previously that there was more than one. Perhaps this was > mistaken. In any event, I don't believe DLV was designed to be > monopolistic. > > > Since the root is not signed, a reasonable TLD operator which > > signs with DNSSEC has only one point to watch before dismissing his > > old key. > > The issue is that ISC harvests data from the ITAR and they didn't > synch the change submitted by PR to the ITAR.
The issue is that ITAR has no policy on often the users of ITAR should check or what a minimum key roll over period should be after a update is submitted to ITAR. Annually is "regularly". Monthly is "regularly". Weekly is "regularly". Daily is "regularly". Hourly is "regularly". Every "minute" is "regularly". Every second is "regularly". Which "regularly" did IANA mean when it said "regularly"? PR created a effective key rollover period of 2 days which was insanely short when there will be sites that are updating from ITAR manually. > Regards, > -drc > > > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
