On Thu, 8 Oct 2009, Chris Hills wrote:
On 06/10/09 03:30, internet-dra...@ietf.org wrote:
Many sites connected to the Internet make use of IPv4 addresses which
are not globally unique. Examples are the addresses designated in
RFC1918 for private use within individual sites.
Should this be extended to include RFC4193 unique local ipv6 unicast
addresses (i.e. [cd].f.ip6.arpa.)?
An argument could be made for the inclusion of that, plus one could also
argue that perhaps the time has come to have AS112 answer similar via IPv6
addresses as well. But do we re-open those discussions or encourage
getting these out the door - after all this time?
wfms
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
