On 3 Oct 2010, at 16:14, Phillip Hallam-Baker <hal...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Moving from a market based solution with multiple CAs to a monopoly with one > trust provider does not help at all. It makes the situation much worse > because there is now no possibility of choice in the future.
It has the advantage of preventing a race to the bottom. Note that there is a fair amount of choice available at lower levels in the DNS. So long as the registry provides a secure infrastructure, customers of secure registrars need not be concerned that insecure registrars can steal their names. There is no similar regulation of CAs. Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
