On Nov 15, 2010, at 11:35 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > Every draft on internationlization is not an > opportunity to re-explore the rathole down which the IDNABIS working > group laboured for several years.
+<U+221E> > All the current > draft does is permit TLDs that are in conformance with IDNA2008, > except that it attempts to make the change as small as possible in > order to try to minimise the possibility of surprises from software > that had understood RFC 1123 as protocol and not policy. While I agree with the intent, I suspect we'll be revisiting this issue in the relatively near-term when folks realize that "1*63(ALPHA)" means they can't have their "fun4u" or "2go" TLDs. > I think the document should be shipped as soon as possible. Agreed. Regards, -drc _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
