[ Quoting <matth...@nlnetlabs.nl> in "Re: [DNSOP] I-D Action: draft-ietf-..." ] > > While dnsop-dnssec-key-timing provides a fairly thorough > > background which promotes understanding of the underlying issues, > > it's still a thorny document to apply to an actual operational > > event. > > > > I think it would be great if we could present your model (or > > something similarly robust and simple) in such a way that it > > becomes the normal way of thinking about rollover events, both for > > implementers of DNSSEC signing platforms and for operators of > > DNSSEC-signed zones. The world would be a better place. > > Thanks.
I like this idea too. But does this mean 4641bis is overly complex wrt to key rollovers? grtz Miek
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
