-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 08/09/2012 01:17 PM, Stephen Morris wrote: > Paul Hoffman: Kill it. Will be the wrong message to the community > sending out two documents. Operators will implement this, and later > be surprised by the change. Kill it and have the -bis document > include everything. > > Matthijs Mekking: Yep, agree, same question again.
That was not what I was trying to say. I was neither in favor nor against killing it. I just want to prevent another long delay with regard to the topic on key timing. > > Stephen Morris: Is the -bis document based on your experience of > implementation? > > Matthijs Mekking: This document is not flexible enough, this is > the experience, eg. when going from signed to unsigned. To sum up, > yes. And more importantly: algorithm rollover and rollovers in single type signing scheme. > Best regards, Matthijs -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJQI6bhAAoJEA8yVCPsQCW5R24H+wcxndie3Wm/NPbx08NESwim ai9sxRVJIXv2/4cjcj0vxHt3f4AJy759W1yeN6ENMVFy3H1YK2tnZGtWjV35WyG0 PccrnXPosbxOjpjX1nkfAef0IEV/96yxP3JvOgwPc4Z1dW+61uptPA5/4RPuTmxg YA8TUxL+3S4aCjRI0y8XPZKDyac683ghsvQsCtalZUh40ku/zVxkx+M++6CR6+ba tpnAvrEH6o0AszU6P2nVre2I2zQI/2Cm3d3IolqjuO7uXBrWhcy2laBLvRT+0yxO LfeEeEWCXRJAiKZrXU6eVq1pMuGM3AVt9wCfr9rE+VYdIZaKeoI04xq0kaN76QM= =cNyO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
