I support adoption. I am volunteering for document review. -G
On 10/02/2013, at 6:45 AM, Peter Koch <p...@denic.de> wrote: > Dear WG, > > the topic of AS112 has been addresses in the DNSOP WG resulting in > RFCs 6304 and 6305 and is also related to 'local zones' as described in > RFC 6303. > > The question of extending AS112 service to IPv6 (as in "transport") > as well as the maintainability of the list of zones served by AS112 > systems has been discussed before. We have a proposal in > > draft-wkumari-dnsop-omniscient-as112-01.txt > > to make the AS112 served zone set extendable in the future. > Please read the draft and state whether you think this is something > the WG - and you in particular - would want to work on. We'd like to > find five volunteers for thorough document reviews to support the > draft going forward - provided the overall response is positive. > > It is always very helpful if people could identify open questions in/w.r.t. > the draft, but please don't forget to also state your opinion on adoption. > > Please respond by the end of next week, so that we could ask future > editors to submit a renamed -00 version by Monday, Feb 18. > > Thanks, > Peter & Stephen > _______________________________________________ > DNSOP mailing list > DNSOP@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
