-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Op 01-07-13 23:43, Warren Kumari schreef: > Hi there, > > We would like to draw your attention to a new draft.
I like this draft and concept, but how new is it? It's good to be documented though. I feel like when a recursive resolver has implemented HAMMER, and HAMMER_TIME is set to zero, we have an existing sticky resolver. One thing that fails though for this analogy to be complete, is how iterative the "cache fill" query will be. If a record from a zone is about to expire, but it still has a valid NS set for that zone in it's cache, will it ignore or use that NS set to issue the iterative query? If it does use it, thereby being a full sticky resolver, it will create less DNS traffic for static delegated zones, as it does not hit the parent again. If it doesn't, and ignores the NS set for the zone in it's cache, and re-queries the parent, it will hit the parent harder than when it did not implement HAMMER, and probably create more DNS traffic than without HAMMER. I feel this needs to be clarified in the draft. - -- Antoin Verschuren Technical Policy Advisor SIDN Meander 501, PO Box 5022, 6802 EA Arnhem, The Netherlands P: +31 26 3525500 M: +31 6 23368970 Mailto: antoin.verschu...@sidn.nl XMPP: antoin.verschu...@jabber.sidn.nl HTTP://www.sidn.nl/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJR0qZwAAoJEDqHrM883AgnjXwH/1iXPQM8YGj1AlZ13OSaRReC 5yPkzpOz0mnP3gGI9KBjM6iu8W2xUn1urxU3P0i0Ix4L7IXm1tu5T4U5L+YlkdRD XYqWD/RzPObQqeyZ9YnMZRXXAtf2jXOhTYmFyQNgCkyjRTKsxJ8lEGU9OXLzptLU fE1536L+65+h+4XXeJ4OCYcVb3QA0TnMofjurWg/TM8zbtx11/COO63EbTAh1fnx xevpFO7ZQl5a2XNFZMlL3suPhuAwMH9drfr1QGXPS+w4b6HPwSuV6FSs1V2y+Uq0 8iESFnCGCc1qM7+3hFZoOhdiyniJv/tGt+HvzrpHGJrnYzZMjz/CLyTlzPxPyq0= =SCyx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
