Mark Andrews wrote:
> The data stored at www.example.net is usually very different to the
> data stored at example.net. For www.example.net you often don't
> care about anything other than A and AAAA. The same can not be
> said for example.net even after you remove SOA, NS and DNSKEY from
> the evaluation.
Are you saying to have:
www.example.net. SOA ...
NS ...
CNAME example.net.
?
What's wrong with:
_http._tcp.example.net. SRV ... www.example.net.
?
>> The update is never rely on cached CNAME for SOA or NS query.
>>
>> Thus, even without the update, most people won't notice lack
>> of the update.
>
> Most != all.
Those who notice are those who can update their servers if
they think it necessary (I think it is not).
Masataka Ohta
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
