-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Op 02-09-14 om 09:31 schreef Andrew Sullivan: > On Tue, Sep 02, 2014 at 09:28:15AM +0200, Antoin Verschuren wrote: >> Reducing latency, or better, not increasing latency by introducing >> anycast is it's secondary goal. > > For a number of customers of at least one provider I know (my > employer), the reverse is true. Customers expect 100% uptime from > their DNS as a matter of course, and they don't care about anycast for > that reason. They care about performance of page loads, and nothing > else.
Which is sort of what I was saying. First goal is to have 100% uptime. Second goal is performance. Low latency -if- you get an answer is not enough. You want an answer all the time, and not a fast one 90% of the time and none 10% of the time. Ideally you want a fast answer 100% of the time. - -- Antoin Verschuren Technical Policy Advisor SIDN Meander 501, PO Box 5022, 6802 EA Arnhem, The Netherlands P: +31 26 3525500 M: +31 6 23368970 Mailto: antoin.verschu...@sidn.nl XMPP: antoin.verschu...@jabber.sidn.nl HTTP://www.sidn.nl/ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUBXV9AAoJEDqHrM883AgnF+MH/AiOBmzJoEdGmJ6q0WBfUap1 O68a6flcLqZd3LkuBz52DP/yozj7oPtZvisTUJCk3WM5RW4dIZPgqBGwvQV9Le7j SAVZDZ2547NFC/a1iyPytyS1lyRBGOGBR+DWEPgbFCwtcUFlzXG0HNa/dq3EXAvw 2XJH965o7kCiviZqEatS2uB+REvFquI4Es+hGwNNnbrZmYqlVYJ1eIq0GZlzH4LA ANCdt7NIZt0zvv+338fDZeT29NTt8jiY14p1RKk0eE78LbCuJDGxkO6fIqIqykvy Sf7mX2A1GC2eeSoxNfL20Jo2S0wQutx6ILBtDVDBdi/dFHLvoTJMnZ501/b1RVA= =J1WS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
