Scott Rose: > > 4th paragraph: I'd suggest dropping the word "illegal" It's a > > loaded term and may not be true depending on the jurisdiction.
Stephane Bortzmeyer writes: > Ed Lewis did a similar remark. The idea is to have one short word for > "something which is a violation of the RFC". Any idea for a better > word, less legally loaded? Non-conformant. > That being said, not doing minimisation for some qtypes seem to be > an overoptimisation, not worth the complexity. Also, OPENPGPKEY is a > bad example because it is a case where there is PII even after the > second label so Qname m12n is *more* important for this type. On a barely related note, qname min helps with the logical progression of the DNSSEC chain when a signed subdomain of a signed domain is hosted on the same machine. With longest match rules a full qname means the resolver has to infer that there's a missing link it needs to go back and ask about. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
