So I have adjusted the configuration on my workstation's name server to include the global root servers (for robustness) as well as a local stealth slave (for low latency). Here's a count of queries directed at the root zone and the servers chosen to handle them. I wonder how different it would be if I had worse connectivity...
115 ::1#53 28 128.63.2.53 14 192.112.36.4 23 192.203.230.10 27 192.228.79.201 22 192.33.4.12 28 192.36.148.17 21 192.5.5.241 35 192.58.128.30 21 193.0.14.129 30 198.41.0.4 28 199.7.83.42 28 199.7.91.13 15 2001:500:1::803f:235 20 2001:500:2::c 14 2001:500:2d::d 8 2001:500:2f::f 14 2001:500:3::42 12 2001:500:84::b 60 2001:503:ba3e::2:30 36 2001:503:c27::2:30 14 2001:7fd::1 17 2001:7fe::53 40 2001:dc3::35 29 202.12.27.33 Tony. -- f.anthony.n.finch <d...@dotat.at> http://dotat.at/ Southwest Viking: Southeasterly 7 to severe gale 9. Rough or very rough. Occasional drizzle. Moderate or good. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
