> David Conrad <mailto:d...@virtualized.org> > Friday, November 14, 2014 1:10 PM > Hi, > > I think AS112 is a red herring: it doesn't prove anything that wasn't > already known ages ago (i.e., BGP works). > > I believe a better (still not perfect) analogy would be 6to4 and I'd > refer to the discussion around > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-v6ops-6to4-to-historic-08.
my reason for mentioning AS112 is that its target protocol is UDP request-response (that is, DNS itself, same as for scalingroot-00), and is in my opinion more relevant to this discussion than the 6to4 experience, where multi-roundtrip protocols such as TCP/80 were meant to be carried. nevertheless: > > However, I'm a bit confused: AFAIK, we're talking about a draft that > has been revised and that revision has not been submitted to DNSOP for > consideration (yet). Perhaps it would make sense to defer discussion > until the revised draft is more generally available? strong +1 here. i've issued and then discussed my apologia for the poor readability and high controversy of scalingroot-00, and i'd be grateful if we could postpone any more scalingroot-XX discussion until after scalingroot-00 is published. -- Paul Vixie
_______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
