My apologies.  It seems that most of the time when I respond, I learn that
I did not understand properly (meaning I was wrong).



-- 
Bob Harold
hostmaster, UMnet, ITcom
Information and Technology Services (ITS)
rharo...@umich.edu
734-647-6524 desk

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 1:25 PM, Robert Edmonds <edmo...@mycre.ws> wrote:

> Bob Harold wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Robert Edmonds <edmo...@mycre.ws>
> wrote:
> >
> > > ...
> > >
> > > Leaving aside the minor stuff like whether to use upper case or lower
> > > case, etc., if there were a "canonical" way to write a zone file, I'd
> > > recommend placing all RRs constituting an RRset together, without
> > > interleaving RRs from different RRsets, so that one doesn't need to
> scan
> > > the entire zone file before extracting RRsets.  I can't think of an
> > > example from an RFC where RRs aren't shown like this, so at least there
> > > are aesthetic reasons to place them like this.  (It seems like a case
> of
> > > unnecessary flexibility in the original spec.)
> > >
> > > --
> > > Robert Edmonds
> > >
> > >
> > I can see a case where in a hand-edited zone file that one might want to
> > group by the type of record - putting all the MX records together,
> possibly
> > in an $INCLUDE file controlled by the mail team, where the "A" records
> are
> > controlled by the server team.  So the RR sets would not be together in
> the
> > file.
> > (Having moved to a database system, I don't remember exactly how the zone
> > files were arranged when we hand-edited them, but I remember we often
> > grouped records by type.)
>
> RRsets are type-specific, though, so you can still place an MX RRset and
> address RRsets for the same owner name contiguously in separate sections
> of the zone file.  (I'm not saying that all RRs should be placed
> contiguously by owner name.)
>
> --
> Robert Edmonds
>
> _______________________________________________
> DNSOP mailing list
> DNSOP@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
>
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to