I re-send here two questions that have apparently not been addressed
in -01

On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 06:42:26PM +0100,
 Stephane Bortzmeyer <bortzme...@nic.fr> wrote 
 a message of 37 lines which said:

> Section 3, "some network devices deliberately refuse to handle DNS
> packets containing EDNS0 options" Isn't it true of DNS-over-TCP as
> well? SAC035 is pessimistic (see table 2). Do we have other data on
> TCP (lack of) support in middleboxes?

> In the same section, should we add a word about poisoning attacks?
> AFAIK, at least one resolver, CNS, switches to TCP when it receives
> too many answers with the wrong Query ID. Should we document that
> the use of TCP may make poisoning more difficult?

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to