On 24.3.2015 19:20, Paul Hoffman wrote: > Again: a proposal for an operational change to DNSSEC needs to be explicit > about the tradeoffs, particularly when one of the options is "you will be > considered unsigned by some resolvers when you implement this". The current > draft is not have this.
That's right. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
