On Apr 2, 2015, at 4:39 PM, Dave Lawrence <t...@dd.org> wrote:
> I don't see primary/secondary as being inviolable roles, but only in
> relation to each other, much the same way as was being said above for
> master/slave.  "Now the student becomes the teacher."  Just because a
> nameserver is getting its data from some other doesn't mean it can't
> then in turn be the primary nameserver for other secondaries.

Master and disciple?   ;)

_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop

Reply via email to