On Apr 2, 2015, at 4:39 PM, Dave Lawrence <t...@dd.org> wrote: > I don't see primary/secondary as being inviolable roles, but only in > relation to each other, much the same way as was being said above for > master/slave. "Now the student becomes the teacher." Just because a > nameserver is getting its data from some other doesn't mean it can't > then in turn be the primary nameserver for other secondaries.
Master and disciple? ;) _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop