On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 11:19:07AM -0700, 神明達哉 wrote: > Can someone explain why we'd need the separate error codes based on > the position of supporting them (i.e, not to persuade others on > dropping them)? msg13984.html was basically written to argue against > them, so it could potentially and unintentionally be biased. I'll try > to find any such explanation myself, but if someone already knows it > better can do that, it would also help.
"Next by thread" from msg13984 has Donald explaining his position, though not in great detail. If I understand him correctly, he wants to enable a server to include cookie errors even if it's chosen in this case to return an otherwise normal NOERROR response to the client. -- Evan Hunt -- e...@isc.org Internet Systems Consortium, Inc. _______________________________________________ DNSOP mailing list DNSOP@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
