Stephane,
I think it depends. I seem to remember that there was discussion that
the WG put an "Experimental" on the draft, which means it could pass
through quickly and then be revised when there has been some
implementations and feedback. I'm open for opinions.
tim
On 6/5/15 7:50 AM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:
On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 12:51:21AM +0000,
Warren Kumari <war...@kumari.net> wrote
a message of 205 lines which said:
... speaking of WGLC, what is the status of this?
The recent set of changes and comments all look minor - did I miss
anything, or does this look close to cooked?
There have been very good feedback in Dallas (basically, to have just
one way of doing things, and to move every option such as
root-optimisation or qtype-preservation, to appendixes), and this
suggested to do some rewriting, which is not published yet. I will do
it, I promise, but it is, IMHO, too early for the WGLC.
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
_______________________________________________
DNSOP mailing list
DNSOP@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dnsop
